Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8809G outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8809G is 77 days older than Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8809G
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 364 vs 329 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8809G - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
329
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $144.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8809G | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |