Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8809G outperforms Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8809G is 611 days newer than Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8809G
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6900K - 131 vs 128 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8809G - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8809G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |