Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8809G outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8809G is 1927 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8809G
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 187 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8809G | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |