Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1562 days newer than Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-880 - 235 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 12 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
