Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $112.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10320 - $1.23 vs $1.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-880 - 109 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
91
83.4862385321101%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4890 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
96.09375%
Price, $
$139.99
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4899 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
33.78817413905133%
Multi-Core
1653
35.73281452658885%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |