Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3623 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $180.0 vs $440.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900K - $1.18 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 61% better in F1 23 than Core i7-875K - 245 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |