Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3145 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-875K - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $96.0 vs $180.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-875K - $0.61 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8947 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |