Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8559U outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8559U is 1305 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8559U
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 173 vs 163 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8559U - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-8559U
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8559U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
