Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 4486 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 41% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-820QM - 149 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9719 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |