Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3872 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-820QM - 185 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |