Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3872 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-820QM - 134 vs 117 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |