Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2934 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-820QM - 158 vs 148 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |