Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 45 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 107 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $270.0 vs $496.17
- Up to 44% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-7820X - $2.62 vs $4.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 24 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.64/FPS
56%
Price, $
$496.17
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $496.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16314 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
96%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |