Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 297 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 5 2600 - 144 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $85.76 vs $496.17
- Up to 83% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i7-7820X - $0.6 vs $3.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.45/FPS
17%
Price, $
$496.17
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $496.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
143
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |