Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1359 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-7820X - 184 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $85.13 vs $496.17
- Up to 83% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-7820X - $0.46 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $496.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12323 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |