Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7800X is 174 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7800X
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930 - 57 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-7800X - $63.92 vs $472.84
- Up to 83% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7800X - $1.39 vs $8.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-7800X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $472.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
46
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7800X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |