Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $63.92 vs $998.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing Control than Core i9-9940X - $0.32 vs $4.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G3930 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 28 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
98.51485148514851%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59204 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.95/FPS
6.4646464646464645%
Price, $
$998.95
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $998.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
41.67237834132968%
Multi-Core
1043
9.716787777156698%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |