Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $98.02 vs $899.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i9-10920X - $1.03 vs $6.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 38% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G3930 - 131 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
95
72%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10082 minutes ago
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |