Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 480 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7800X - 181 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-7800X - $410.0 vs $482.84
- Up to 19% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7800X - $2.27 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7800X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7800X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $482.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$410
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7800X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |