Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7700T is 219 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 171 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $150.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.88 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 24 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5278 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |