Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $167.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900F - $1.27 vs $2.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-7700 - 153 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8736 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |