Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-740QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2389 days newer than Core i7-740QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-740QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-740QM - 94 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-740QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-740QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-740QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |