Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $92.61 vs $120.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6900K - $0.59 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 879 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $92.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |