Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1731 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 114% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-2120T - 47 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-2120T - $2.55 vs $2.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $60.0 vs $120.0
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
50%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12029 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |