Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $99.9 vs $179.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600K - $0.25 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6700T - 453 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
404
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4808 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
453
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
62%
Price, $
$179.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |