Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 940 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G1620 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $49.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-6700 - $0.23 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
35.9375%
Price, $
$135
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
31.631863882443927%
Multi-Core
723
17.46376811594203%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |