Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2762 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-640M - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $144.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |