Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3824 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-640M - 237 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 16 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |