Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-620M vs Core i9-9900

Core i7-620M vs Core i9-9900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 3393 days newer than Core i7-620M.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 35 vs 65 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900

  • Performs up to 7% better in Halo Infinite than Core i7-620M - 163 vs 152 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 16 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Halo Infinite.
Halo Infinite

Halo Infinite

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-620M Logo
Core i7-620M

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010


FPS

152

93%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i9-9900 Logo
Core i9-9900

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

163

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.08/FPS

100%

Price, $

$339

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-9900 Coffee Lake Processor 3.1GHz 8.0GT/s 16MB LGA 1151 CPU, Retail

Buy for $339 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 6390 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-620M Logo
Core i7-620M

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010

Intel Core i9-9900 Logo
Core i9-9900

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-620M Logo
Core i7-620M

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010


Single-Core

439

27%

Multi-Core

814

11%

Intel Core i9-9900 Logo
Core i9-9900

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Single-Core

1611

100%

Multi-Core

7204

100%

Intel Core i7-620M Logo

Intel Core i7-620M

vs
Intel Core i9-9900 Logo

Intel Core i9-9900

Jan 7th, 2010Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
Core i7CollectionCore i9
ArrandaleCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel BGA 1288SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
4Threads
16
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.0 GHz
35 W
TDP65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
20.0xMultiplier
31.0x
HD Graphics (Ironlake)Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.