Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3955 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 49% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-620M - 658 vs 442 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
658
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$292.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $292.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |