Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3766 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 53% better in War Thunder than Core i7-620M - 198 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 20 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |