Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4646 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 33% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-620M - 222 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$460.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |