Buy on Amazon
$412.83
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2727 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-620M - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 20 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$412.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-7900X X-Series Processor 10 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-620M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
