Buy on Amazon
$185
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 1020 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-620M - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 8 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-620M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
