Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2068 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-5930K - 209 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $250.0 vs $549.95
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-5930K - $1.2 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 20 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |