Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 637 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 157 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $49.0 vs $549.95
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
35.38062283737024%
Multi-Core
723
13.193430656934307%
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |