Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 455 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G640 - 156 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $30.0 vs $199.88
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77825 minutes ago
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77825 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
444
67.47720364741642%
Multi-Core
750
30.737704918032787%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |