Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Core i7-4820K - 114 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $160.91 vs $199.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing New World than Core i7-4820K - $1.41 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7451 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |