Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $199.88 vs $210.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4820K - 171 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4820K - $1.23 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1884 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |