Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 242 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $199.88 vs $219.95
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-4150T - $0.53 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-4820K - 389 vs 380 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
380
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |