Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2191 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-4150T - 301 vs 282 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $208.99 vs $219.95
- Up to 12% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-4150T - $0.69 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 16 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3516 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |