Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1919 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4810MQ - 153 vs 149 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |