Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $149.88 vs $268.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13600K - $1.47 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4790T - 130 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
102
78%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
71%
Price, $
$268.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |