Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $149.88 vs $189.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600K - $0.37 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-4790T - 453 vs 402 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
402
88.74172185430463%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1809 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
453
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
88.09523809523809%
Price, $
$189
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1150
52.607502287282706%
Multi-Core
3381
39.41018766756032%
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |