Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4770T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than Core i7-4770T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4770T - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770T - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$259.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |