Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 122 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $112.02 vs $498.95
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4765T - $0.97 vs $4.09 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10896 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10895 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |