Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i7-4712HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 160 days newer than Core i7-4712HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712HQ
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 37 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-4712HQ - 251 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-4712HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4712HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
