Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-4700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2157 days newer than Core i7-4700HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4700HQ - 151 vs 148 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |