Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1296 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3820 - 259 vs 257 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $26.99 vs $319.88
- Up to 92% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-3820 - $0.1 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11560 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |