Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3613 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-3820 - 135 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $59.99 vs $319.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-3820 - $0.44 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10248 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |